Evaluation of Water Quality by Benthic Macroinvertebrate at the Jukjeon Stream in Korea
##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##
This work was studied to investigate the water quality of the Jukjeon stream in Korea based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Several ecological score of benthic macroinvertebrate community were used in the estimation of stream from each of the three stations of the sub-watersheds. During the study periods, the results showed a total of 619 individual benthic macroinvertebrates were collected, including 23 families and 44 species. The first dominant species was Culicini sp. and second was Baetis fuscatus. Ecological score of benthic macroinvertebrate community (ESB) was varied from 61 (St. D) to 71 (St. A) with a mean of 66.5. Water quality at the Jukjeon Stream was grade I. The values of benthic macroinvertebrate index (BMI) at St. A and St. B were 60.4 and 53.4, respectively. Water quality at the two stations was grade C (moderate) on the based BMI. The values of BMI at St. C and St. D were 45.5 and 39.6, respectively. Water quality at the two stations was grade D (bad). The Shannon diversity index (H') of diversity was varied from 3.76 (St. A) to 4.18 (St. B) with a mean of 4.05. The rank percentages of species based on individual abundance (RI) were 4.84 (St. A), 5.66 (St. B), 6.31 (St. C), and 5.97 (St. D). Evenness indices (J) were varied from 0.79 (St. C) to 0.84 (St. B). The values of EPT (Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera and Tricoptera) at St. A, St. B, St. C, and St. D were 0.56, 0.48, 0.29, and 0.17 with a mean of 0.37, respectively. The EPT group accounted for 37% of the total species and 53% of the total individuals. The diversity and richness indices were lower in St. A than in the other stations. In this study, rapid assessment of water quality by macroinvertebrate indicators involves effort and reduced cost in natural stream evaluation.
References
-
Kenney MA, Sutton-Grier AE, Smith RF, Gresens SE. Benthic macroinvertebrates as indicators of water quality: The intersection of science and policy. Terr Arthropod Rev. 2009; 2: 99-128.
Google Scholar
1
-
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). Water Quality Standards Academy: Basic Course. Office of Water. Washington District of Columbia, U.S.A.; 2005.
Google Scholar
2
-
Karr J. Defining and measuring river health. Freshw Biol. 1999; 41: 221-234.
Google Scholar
3
-
Czerniawska-Kusza I. Comparing modified biological monitoring working party score system and several biological indices based on macroinvertebrates for water-quality assessment. Limnologica. 2005; 35: 169-176.
Google Scholar
4
-
Tampo L, Kabore I, Alhassan EH, Oueda A. Benthic macroinvertebrates as ecological indicators: their sensitivity to the water quality and human disturbances in a tropical river. Front Water. 2021 September DOI:10.3389/frwa.2021.662765.
Google Scholar
5
-
Buffagni A, Crosa G, Harper DM, Kemp JL. Using macroinvertebrate species assemblages to identify river channel habitat units: an application of the functional habitat concept to a large, unpolluted Italian river (River Ticino, Northern Italy). Hydrobiologia. 2000; 435: 213–225.
Google Scholar
6
-
Lorenz A, Hering D, Feld CK, Rolauffs P. A new method for assessing the impact of hydromorphological degradation on the macroinvertebrate fauna of five German stream types. Hydrobiologia. 2004; 516: 107-127.
Google Scholar
7
-
Lenat DR. Water quality assessment of streams using a qualitative collection method for benthic macroinvertebrates. J North Am Benthol Soc. 1988; 7: 222-233.
Google Scholar
8
-
Malla S, Rout SK. Assessment of the ecological status of Mathura Beel, a flood plain wetland in Nadia, West Bengal, India by using benthic macroinvertebrates. NeBIO. 2015; 6: 32-38.
Google Scholar
9
-
Kwon O. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna and Flora of Korea. Vol. 32, Ministry of Education, Seoul, Korea; 1990.
Google Scholar
10
-
Buckland ST, Magurran AE, Green RE, Fewster RM. Monitoring change in biodiversity through composite indices. Philoso Trans Royal Soc B. 2005; 360: 243-254.
Google Scholar
11
-
USEPA. Sampling and Analytical Procedures for GLNPO’s Open Lake Water Quality Survey of the Great Lakes; Chapter 4 - Biological Parameters; LG406 - Standard Operating Procedure for Benthic Invertebrate Field Sampling Procedure, Revision 07, EPA 905-R-03-002; 2003.
Google Scholar
12
-
Metcalfe JL. Biological water quality assessment of running waters based on macroinvertebrate communities: History and present status in Europe. Environ Pollut. 1989; 60: 101-139, https://doi.org/10.1016/0269-7491(89)90223-6
Google Scholar
13
-
Kwon O. Illustrated Encyclopedia of Fauna and Flora of Korea, Vol. 32, Seoul, Korea: Ministry of Education; 1990.
Google Scholar
14
-
McCafferty P. Aquatic Eentomology. The Fisherman’s and Ecologists’ Illustrated Guide to Insects and Their Relatives. Boston, MS: Jones & Bartlett Publishers Inc.; 1981.
Google Scholar
15
-
Merritt RW, Cummins KW. An Introduction to the Aquatic Insects of North America, 3rd, Dubuque, Iowa; Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co; 1996.
Google Scholar
16
-
Won DH, Kwon SJ, Jeon YC. Aquatic Insects of Korea. Gwacheon, Korea: Ecological Research Team Co. Ltd.; 2005.
Google Scholar
17
-
Tsuda M. Biology of Polluted Waters. Tokyo, Japan: Hokuryu-kan; 1964.
Google Scholar
18
-
National Institute of Environmental Research (NIER). The 2nd National Ecosystem Survey Guide, National Institute of Environmental Research, Seoul, Korea; 2002.
Google Scholar
19
-
Kong DS, Park Y, Jeon VR. Revision of ecological score of benthic macroinvertebrates community in Korea. J Kor Soc Water Environ. 2018; 34: 251-269.
Google Scholar
20
-
Kong DS, Son SH, Kim JY, Won DH, Kim MC, Park JH, et al. Development and application of Korean benthic macroinvertebrates index for biological assessment on stream environment, proceedings of the 2012 spring conference and water environmental forum of Yeongsan River. Kor Soc Limnol. 2012; 34: 33-36.
Google Scholar
21
-
Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Measurement Theory of Communication. Urbana, IL.: University of Illinois Press; 1949.
Google Scholar
22
-
Colwell RK, Elsensohn JE. EstimateS turns 20: statistical estimation of species richness and shared species from samples, with non-parametric extrapolation. Ecography. 2014; 37: 609-613.
Google Scholar
23
-
Pielou EC. The measurement of diversity in different types of biological collection. J Theor Biol. 1966; 13: 131-144.
Google Scholar
24
-
Armanini DG, Horrigan N, Monk WA, Peters DL, Baird DJ. Development of a benthic macroinvertebrate flow sensitivity index for Canadian rivers. River Res Appl. 2011; 274: 723-737, https://doi.org/10.1002/rra.1389.
Google Scholar
25
-
Rodell M, Famiglietti JS, Wiese DN, Reager JT, Beaudoing HK, Landerer FW, et al. Emerging trends in global freshwater availability. Nature. 2018; 557: 651–659.
Google Scholar
26
-
Huh MK. Species composition of benthic macroinvertebrate and water evaluation at the Baekyeok Stream in Korea. J Kor Data Anal Soc. 2021; 23: 997-1006.
Google Scholar
27
-
Best J, Darby SE. The pace of human-induced change in large rivers: stresses, resilience, and vulnerability to extreme events. One Earth. 2020; 2: 510–514.
Google Scholar
28
-
WHO. Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality. Fourth edition. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2011.
Google Scholar
29
-
Brysiewicz A, Czerniejewski P, Dąbrowski J, Formicki K. Characterisation of benthic macroinvertebrate communities in small watercourses of the European central plains ecoregion and the effect of different environmental factors. Animals. 2022; 12: 606. https://doi.org/10.3390/ani12050606.
Google Scholar
30
Most read articles by the same author(s)
-
Man Kyu Huh,
The Influence of Calcium Chloride on Soil Animals, Microorganisms, and Phytoplankton , European Journal of Environment and Earth Sciences: Vol. 4 No. 3 (2023)